Just curious whether it might make sense to remove the high-scorers who haven't been active for anywhere from 2 to 6 years? Also, your approach to calculating scores has changed over that time, so the results aren't really comparable anyway.
Just curious whether it might make sense to remove the high-scorers who haven't been active for anywhere from 2 to 6 years? Also, your approach to calculating scores has changed over that time, so the results aren't really comparable anyway.