Best posts made by blevie1

Just curious whether it might make sense to remove the high-scorers who haven't been active for anywhere from 2 to 6 years? Also, your approach to calculating scores has changed over that time, so the results aren't really comparable anyway.

Noticed this a couple of days ago. The meter is indicating 100% for a lower scoring word (most recent example is in topic name) - but then I find another word that's better, and it also shows as 100%. Can this be fixed - or if the meter can't be relied upon, perhaps it should just be removed?