Ranking
-
you appear to have missed the point - I was replying to the question about rankings - not asking about them - I pretty much said exactly the same thing in different words!! But thanks anyway!!
-
@tim-bastable You appear to have missed the point. I was speaking to Kathleen. Thanks for your input tho
-
@tim-bastable Tim - some people don't read other's comments, they just like to answer their own way, despite it being answered (as you had done).
-
@Pangloss very true we all do not read out of a book . or go to wiki thanks.
-
I think starting people at 1200 is a bad policy.
It used to be a median starting ranking of 1600.
Where people could go up or down from.1200 is very low and wastes a person's time climbing up and getting complaints of cheating along the way.
Only defense I can think of for 1200 is that it might dissuade folks form opening multiple accounts.
-
-
@Ginger-Rodgers totally agree!!!
-
Why is the scoring so unfair? If I win I get very few points and if I lose I get clobbered! Please can someone explain? I am now trailing in score someone against whom I have won far more games. N.
-
@niki35 As someone remarked earlier on this thread, it depends on your relative ratings ("ranking"). If you have a rating of 1500 and you beat someone with a 2000 rating, you get big points out of that. But if that much higher rated player beats you, they get minimal points.
-
Thank you for taking the trouble to reply to my post.
