@lolamoth Your initial assumption is incorrect. I rewrote it: The rule is that the value of the remaining tiles at the end is subtracted from their Move Score and added to the Move Score of the player who emptied their rack on the last play regardless of who wins.

And part of the strategy at the end can involve what tiles you'll be left with if the other plays out first.

@lolamoth We will see on what can be done in that case.

@lolamoth You would be amazed how often that happens

@lolamoth There used to be a term, "hiders," for people who had a substantial amount of playing experience and then decided to do a "reset" by creating and playing under a new ID. People who do this and start out at the new default rating can then win what looks like a suspiciously large number of games in a short amount of time, and can "rob" other players of lots of rating points until someone catches on. Presumably an experienced player who did this would be likely to accumulate a large proportion of bingo scores, too. This sort of behavior is not very sporting, IMHO, especially if one goes in as a "new" 1500 rater and goes after 1900, 2000, and 2100-ers. Whether it calls for a ban, however, is debatable. Nor am I sure that this is what "Happysharks" has done; but it seems like a possibility.

@lolamoth We are checking on this.

@lolamoth are you still crying about the word 'wakanda' ? 😂 Someone really ruffled your feathers when they dropped that bingo on you, didn't they? 😂

@lolamoth I noticed same and more same player have not played since